To suppress free speech in the name of protecting women is dangerous and wrong. -- Betty Friedan
 

SPEAKERS NETWORK
Nadine Strossen
President, American Civil Liberties Union

< < PREVIOUS PAGE

Nadine Strossen, Professor of Law at New York Law School since 1989, has written, lectured and practiced extensively in the areas of constitutional law, civil liberties and international human rights. In January 1991 she was elected President of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), where she had been national general counsel since 1986. Since 1996, Strossen has also been a monthly columnist and contributing editor of the E-zine, Intellectual Capital. Strossen has given numerous lectures and speeches across the U.S. (Including at more than 200 college and university campuses since 1991), and in many foreign countries. She also comments frequently on legal issues in the media.

Strossen is the author of Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex and the Fight for Women's Rights (Anchor Doubleday Paperback) which The New York Times named "A notable book of 1995," and co-author of Speaking of Race, Speaking of Sex: Hate Speech, Civil Rights,and Civil Liberties (NYU Press 1995), which was named Outstanding Book on Human Rights in North America by the Gustavus Myers Center for the Study of Human Rights in North America. Strossen graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Harvard-Radcliffe College (1972) and magna cum Laude from Harvard Law School (1975, where she was an editor of the Law Review. She has also been awarded several honorary degrees.

As president of the American Civil Liberties Union, Nadine Strossen believes that the First Amendment free speech guarantee affords the greatest protection for women's rights and women's safety, including reproductive freedom. Feminist speech has often been considered dangerous speech. Suppressing words and images violates civil liberties as well as feminist principles through its central paternalistic approach of "protecting" women. There is no evidence that censorship will do anything to prevent sexism or violence against women. Further, banning words or images distracts from positive strategies to counter gender discrimination and violence against women.

Topics:

  • Feminism and First Amendment Law
  • Hate speech
  • Sexual harassment
  • Arts censorship
 
This page, and all pages associated with this web site ©Feminists for Free Expression Inc. unless otherwise noted. Contact Webmaster
958